• If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Finally, you can manage your Google Docs, uploads, and email attachments (plus Dropbox and Slack files) in one convenient place. Claim a free account, and in less than 2 minutes, Dokkio (from the makers of PBworks) can automatically organize your content for you.


The Academia_edu Files

This version was saved 5 years ago View current version     Page history
Saved by girl_athena@...
on April 7, 2016 at 6:19:05 pm









Really, We're Helping To Build This . . . Business: The Academia.edu Files, charts the debate over for-profit academic social networking sites (aka academic research sharing platforms) such as Academia.edu, ResearchGate and Mendeley. It features contributions from Gary Hall, Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Eileen Joy and Guy Geltner. Although it has initially been put together by Janneke Adema and Gary Hall, like all those titles in the Liquid Books series, The Academia.edu Files is open for anyone to add to, edit, reversion and comment upon.


Part 1    Background to the Debate




This section provides some background to the development of various academic social networking sites (SNS), as well as highlighting some of the ongoing discussions regarding certain aspects of their continuing development. It provides information about: the business models and capital behind for-profit academic SNS; discussions relating to the new reputation metrics and systems introduced during their development; and plans to implement new commentary and review functions.


Part 2    The Critique


Gary Hall, ‘What Does Academia.edu’s Success Mean for Open Access?' LSE Impact Blog, October 22, 2015


Kathleen Fitzpatrick, ‘Academia. Not Edu’, www.plannedobsolescence.net, October 26, 2015


Martin Eve, 'Academia.edu’s Peer-Review Experiments', www.martineve.com, October 26, 2015 


Alex Rushforth, 'The Facebook-ization of Academic Reputation?', The Citation Culture blog, October 28, 2015.


Guy Geltner. 'Upon Leaving Academia.edu', Mittelalter. Interdisziplinäre Forschung und Rezeptionsgeschichte, December 7, 2015 


Guy Geltner: On Leaving Academia.edu

Katie Fortney and Justin Gonder, ‘A Social Networking Site is Not An Open Access Repository’, Office of Scholarly Communication, University of California, December 2015

Eileen Joy, ‘Open Letter to Rosemary Feal, Kathleen Fitzpatrick, and the Modern Language Association’, Punctum Books Blog, December 15, 2015


Janneke Adema, 'Don’t Give Your Labour To Academia.edu. Use It To Strengthen The Academic Commons', Open Reflections, April 7, 2016


Part 3    Why Are We Not Boycotting Academia.edu?: The Symposium


Why Are We Not Boycotting Academia.edu?


The Centre for Disruptive Media (http://disruptivemedia.org.uk/) at Coventry University organised a symposium on December 9 2015 on academic social networking platforms called ‘Why Are We Not Boycotting Academia.edu?’ 


Janneke Adema (Coventry University, UK)

Slides / Presentation


Pascal Aventurier (INRA, France)

Slides / Presentation


Kathleen Fitzpatrick (MLA/Coventry University, US)



Gary Hall (Coventry University, UK)

Slides / Presentation


David Parry (Saint Joseph University, US)



Part 4    Alternative Platforms


Alternative Platforms


This section lists alternative not-for profit Academic Social Networking Sites, as well as open-source tools and software applications to set-up your own academic SNS, network or functions.








Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.